Posted in September 2010

Shoes That Kill (Your Dignity)

So many women love their high heels. They say the shoes make them feel sexy, confident, sophisticated, thinner, and more powerful. They say that high heels make their legs look better, make their butts look better, and pull their outfits together. They say that men love the look of high heels.

The women devoted to Jimmy Choo, Manolo Blahnik, and all the lesser-known latter-day foot binders leave out some of the other effects high heels cause: knee osteoarthritis, stress fractures, dislocated, rigid, and painful joints, back pain, hammertoes, ingrown toenails, bunions, corns, and calluses.

Remarkably, women do know this. Heel-wearers often admit that heels hurt. They can feel that the shoes are not doing their bodies any favors. Still they strap them on and teeter bravely forth, for reasons that mostly boil down to one thing: they believe the shoes attract men.

One enlightening if only semi-literate web discussion on the topic suggests that men really do like women in high heels, and that men understand heels as a message saying roughly, “I want to be your sex kitten.” A male contributor to the discussion opines that, based on women’s posts to the discussion about their love for their high heels, “it really seems as though the whole feminism movement is dead. I’m not saying that it’s a bad thing.” And then he marvels that most “women don’t seem to realize that” high heels and pantyhose “is [sic] the ultimate turn on! LOL!” Apparently his logic goes like this:

1. Women wear high heels to look sexy to men.
2. Trying to look sexy to men is antithetical to feminism.
3. There are no more feminists.
4. Therefore, the only possible motivation for women not to wear heels is that they don’t realize that men find them sexy.

I admit that based solely on the comments women posted to this discussion his conclusions are not without foundation. Come to think of it, the first point seems right on given the reasons women offer for voluntarily crippling themselves. The second point is where he veers off the rails. Heterosexual feminists, especially after a couple beers, want to lure men to their beds just as much as heterosexual men want to lure women. The self-respecting women among them just don’t want to disfigure themselves in the process, which takes care of point four – women’s motivations for not wearing heels may include their health, their comfort, and keeping their feet pretty, rather than not understanding the male sex drive. As for point three: I’m still here, motherfucker, and look out – unlike you, I know how to punctuate.

But seriously, point three: where has all the feminism gone? Remember when women threw out their girdles, false eyelashes, “women’s” magazines, and – what’s this? – high heels to protest the Miss America pageant? Well, neither do I, I wasn’t born yet, but the protest made history. Feminists dumped the “objects of female torture” into a “Freedom Trash Can.” Then their daughters rummaged through the garbage and emerged holding high a shiny red stiletto. And feminism wept.

Most women are no longer willing to identify as feminists, even though they happily take advantage of the many advances feminism fought to give them – little things like earning decent pay in jobs that don’t involve making coffee for men, access to higher education, and the fundamental realization that domestic violence is a bad thing. But plenty of feminists remain, and even some of them wear high heels. This baffles.

Some will accuse me of being a “sex-negative” feminist. Without divulging too much I will say simply that that is bullshit, and besides, I like to feel pretty too. The point is what, if anything, I am willing to sacrifice to do it, and I have drawn my line at knee replacements and broken bones.

Sexiness is a social construct, not an immutable legacy from our pre-verbal ancestors. If men really do like high heels, they can learn not to like them. After all, they got over liking to wear skin-tight leggings with pantaloons, powdered wigs, and many other fashions that were once de rigueur, and they no longer balk at the sight of a woman not bound up in a corset or at lipstick. If women stop wearing high heels, high heels will go out of fashion, pretty much by definition.

And if men really do like high heels that much, it says some very scary things about how men want to see women. High heels make a woman’s foot appear smaller as her heel blends into her leg and her footprint shrinks to just her toes and the ball of her foot. This harkens back to foot-binding and to Cinderella’s sisters chopping off pieces of their feet to fit into her freakishly tiny pump. Even more disturbing (if possible), high heels make women vulnerable. They walk more slowly (some netizens applaud this effect because it accentuates the sway of their hips) and much less stably. They can’t run (at least, most of them can’t), they are easily knocked over – in other words, they are easy prey. As I said, disturbing.

Should women never wear heels? That is between them and the god of their choice, but if they do decide to mince around on deformed toes of an evening, I’d advise they keep two things in mind: the message their shoes are sending, and the kind of men who like that message. Besides, designer high heels are insanely expensive. Better to save that money for something healthier and safer, like breast implants.

Tagged ,

Israel is in the Vanguard on Ending the Torture of Animals for Profit

No country has ever banned the fur trade, but the Israeli Parliament is about to vote on doing just that. The revolutionary proposed legislation would ban the import, production, and sale of fur.

If the ban passes it will not be the first time Israel has been in the vanguard in saving animals from torture for profit. Seven years ago Israel’s highest court banned foie gras. Financially, this was no small sacrifice for a country that was one of the top five foie gras producers in the world. Israel isn’t the only country to take this step: to date the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K. have also banned foie gras. The United States lags behind – we have yet to place any nationwide limits on foie gras production, which is a gruesome, agonizing process.

Fur is a smaller industry than foie gras in Israel, but internationally fur “farmers” and trappers torture and murder billions of animals every year. The facts are chilling: farmers keep animals (including mink, foxes, chinchillas, lynxes, and others) crowded together in small cages for their entire lives, which are only a few months long unless they are kept for breeding. The confinement causes neurotic behaviors like self-mutilating. Once farmers no longer consider the animals financially productive, they kill them in any number of ways intended not to spoil their coats, including anal and vaginal electrocution, strangling, poisoning, and gassing. Sometimes the animal revives while being skinned.

Fur trappers target wild animals but they are none too particular about who exactly their traps snap shut on. Dogs, cats, and deer are among the species that American trappers throw away after their traps have maimed and sometimes slowly killed them. The trappers don’t have to worry about the animals who frantically chew off their own limbs to escape the trap, which usually leads to an even slower death from infection or bleeding (or a faster death from predation). The species that trappers target fare no better, of course. In other countries, like China, dogs and cats are farmed for fur. When you buy a coat with a fur trim that the label promises is fake, think twice – Chinese exports are sometimes labeled “faux fur” so as not to let American consumers know they are buying cat or dog fur.

One of the many tragedies of the fur industry is that it is supported only by fashion trends, which are ephemeral cultural constructs. All that needs to happen is for people to decide that fur is no longer “in,” and billions of animals would be spared.

Now to the elephant (killed for their ivory, not their skins, and held in slavery by circuses – perhaps a topic for a future blog) in the room: the hero of this piece is Israel, a country that makes the news daily because of terrorism and human rights abuses. Israel is a place where two peoples struggle to survive on one diminutive slip of land despite their mutual hatred and endless vendettas. How is it that a country so occupied with human survival has the vision and compassion to reduce the suffering of non-human animals?

Perhaps people whose daily lives are mired in violence, whether from hearing about it on the news or from mourning lost loved ones, know better than anyone the broad and toxic consequences of violence, the ripples it sends past its immediate victims and into the lives of the aggressors and beyond. Maybe those who know violence best are the most motivated to end it wherever they can.

A more humbling possibility is that even a nation that struggles daily just to survive, a nation in which human lives are in constant jeopardy and youth are almost universally drafted into mandatory military service, can spare the time to save other innocent beings from torture and murder. In contrast the United States, most of which is comparatively cocooned from violence, can’t spare even a thought for the victims of the fur trade. To the contrary, American women (for the most part) are among the industry’s most important supporters. Are we too self-absorbed or lacking in compassion to end the brutality against fur-bearing animals? Are we too unwilling to look behind the storefront window displays of coat-shaped pelts to the agony that turned thinking, feeling animals into outerwear?

Either way, Israel deserves kudos for even considering becoming the first country to make a national decision that fur is “out” forever. Cheer Israeli legislators on by sending a letter encouraging them to vote for the ban. Then take up the cause at home and make America proud.

Tagged ,